Log in


Deadline Call for Participation Only is June 1, 2015 - A.R.T. Education Event - Archives in the Electronic Age: Part I

  • Monday, June 01, 2015
  • 10:00 AM - 5:00 PM
  • Cardozo Law School

Registration


CALL FOR PARTICIPATION!

Submission Deadline: June 1, 2015

  


Archives in the Electronic Age: Part I (#AEA)

The Archivists Round Table of Metropolitan New York, Inc. (A.R.T.) is organizing a two-part series on the topic
of Archives in the Electronic Age. The events will be co-sponsored by the Cardozo Data Law Initiative and The
Sedona Conference®. Part I will be held on June 24, 2015 with Part II scheduled for the evening of October 1,
2015 as a part of Cardozo Tech Talks.

This call for participation is for the June program. The course of life does not change arbitrarily, it evolves.
Innovations do not occur in a vacuum, but are informed by an awareness of the past and are inspired by a vision
of the future. The role of archivists has evolved dramatically during the twentieth century, due to an expanded awareness of the value of documents and materials, a growth in the diversification of subjects requiring archival administration, advances in technologies, and an ever-increasing demand for information of all kinds.

Along the way, new categories of data and types of storage offer new problems to be solved, questions to be
answered. If the majority of humankind's collective knowledge is to become computerized—or eventually
redefined by some technology not yet known—how will this affect our access to and understanding of the pieces
of the jigsaw puzzle that forms the complete picture of our civilization? After all, aren't computers merely another
kind of storage container for documents, in some sense no different from those "air-tight metallic containers"
used in Ohio in the early 1800s? Or do they offer a fundamental challenge to the way we work, think, and relate to one another?

The day will cover issues that might confront archivists and records information management personnel as
records are created or converted into electronic format. The forum will focus on presentations and panel
discussions, studies, strategies, research, analyses, and use studies with the aim of bringing together archivists,
industry experts, records managers, librarians, museum professionals, professors, scholars, academic
researchers and the general public.

The day will be broken up into four one-hour sessions. 

Please click here for a PDF of the Call for Participation


CASE STUDY ONE
A public entity as well as a private organization stored significant volumes of archival materials in a warehouse in New York City. The warehouse burned down and all of the archival materials stored by the two entities were destroyed. This unfortunate and unforeseeable event led to the following questions that were posed to the archivists by their governing bodies:
      • Exactly what was destroyed?
      • Were the archived materials duplicated and stored   
         anywhere else?
      • Assuming that the materials were duplicated in
         electronic format, are these duplicates available to
         the public?

CASE STUDY TWO
During a review of its collection, a private entity noted that it has maintained several hundred VHS tapes. Unfortunately, the labeling on the majority of these tapes
has fallen off or become unreadable. However, the extant labeling describes that the corresponding tapes contain recordings of events presented by the entity. These recordings fall within the definition of the entity’s archival materials. However, the entity cannot play the tapes. A number of questions have been posed to the archivist by
her governing body:
      • Based on what the archivist knows, do all the tapes
        contain recordings of events?
      • If that question cannot be answered, what can or
        should the archivist do to enable her to learn
        whether all the tapes contain recordings of event?
      • Should the entity discard all or some of the tapes
        and, if not, what should be done to transfer the
        contents of the tapes to a readable format?

CASE STUDY THREE
The governing bodies of a private entity has decided to digitize all of its archives and, once having done so, intends to store and preserve all the “original” archival
materials that the archivist deems to be “historically
relevant.” The governing body has also decided that,
given the significant presence of the entity on social media and through its website, that everything on those
media channels should be deemed archival in nature and preserved by the entity. A number of questions have been posed to the archivist by his governing body:
      • How will the archivist decide what is “historically
        relevant?”
      • How will the archivist preserve the content of the
        social media and the website?
      • How will the archivist ensure that, however the
        archives are digitized, the resulting digitized
        materials remain accessible over the next 20 years?
        (The archivist plans to retire in 5 years).

CASE STUDY FOUR
The governor of a state has signed an executive order that will require the state archivist to define the content of
interactive websites maintained by the state as archival
materials and to preserve all such content for twenty
years. However, the governor intends to propose
legislation which will amend the state’s public records law to provide that preserved content need only be produced in response to public records requests in PDF format. A
number of questions have been posed to the state
archivist by the governor (who is, incidentally, a strong advocate of access to public records):
      • What technical issues might arise from requirement
         that content be preserved?
      • What will preservation cost?
      • What are the pros and cons, if any, in production of
         content in the selected format?

Guidelines:
o Original content is required, with the possibility of paper being included in The Sedona Conference® Journal.

o All individual presentations will be a maximum 20 minutes long, leaving time for panel introductions and Q&A.  Individual or entire panel proposals will be considered.

o Submissions must include: title, name of author and institutional affiliation, email address, phone number, abstract (250 words max) and technological requirements.


DEADLINE FOR ABSTRACTS, PAPERS AND PRESENTATIONS:

Monday, June 1, 2015



Event Date: June 24, 2015
Time: 10am-5pm
Location: Cardozo Law School
                55 Fifth Avenue @ 12th Street
                New York, NY 10003

Email to: education@nycarchivists.org



The Archivists Round Table of Metropolitan New York, Inc. (A.R.T.) would like to thank Cardozo Law School for hosting this event.

questions? communications@nycarchivists.org
Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software